BoyzForum! BoyzForum! - forum gay Indonesia www.boyzforum.com

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Selamat datang di situs Boyzforum yang diarsipkan oleh Queer Indonesia Archive. Forum untuk komunitas gay Indonesia yang populer ini didirikan pada tahun 2003, dan ditutup pada tanggal 15 Desember 2020.

Forum ini diabadikan untuk kepentingan sejarah. Tidak akan ada konten baru di forum ini. Silakan menikmati forum ini sebagai potongan dari sejarah queer Indonesia.

Yang Cakep ... Yang Sukses

135678

Comments

  • hmm emang jaman gini org lebih liat penampilan dulu, tapi tetep harus ada baik didalemnya la.. jadi ya.. penampilan tuh penting :wink:

    kayak ex gw dulu tampang & penampilan cupu abisss, gw paksa gini gitu jadi mendingan :lol: LOL
  • andi kaz wrote:
    hmm emang jaman gini org lebih liat penampilan dulu, tapi tetep harus ada baik didalemnya la.. jadi ya.. penampilan tuh penting :wink:

    kayak ex gw dulu tampang & penampilan cupu abisss, gw paksa gini gitu jadi mendingan :lol: LOL
    wleh2 jgn dibahas2 ampe segitunya kali :lol: :lol:
  • abxis wrote:
    andi kaz wrote:
    hmm emang jaman gini org lebih liat penampilan dulu, tapi tetep harus ada baik didalemnya la.. jadi ya.. penampilan tuh penting :wink:

    kayak ex gw dulu tampang & penampilan cupu abisss, gw paksa gini gitu jadi mendingan :lol: LOL
    wleh2 jgn dibahas2 ampe segitunya kali :lol: :lol:



    Ho...oh
  • danu1212 wrote:
    abxis wrote:
    andi kaz wrote:
    hmm emang jaman gini org lebih liat penampilan dulu, tapi tetep harus ada baik didalemnya la.. jadi ya.. penampilan tuh penting :wink:

    kayak ex gw dulu tampang & penampilan cupu abisss, gw paksa gini gitu jadi mendingan :lol: LOL
    wleh2 jgn dibahas2 ampe segitunya kali :lol: :lol:



    Ho...oh

    siapa tuuhhh... buakakaka :lol: :lol:
  • danu1212 wrote:
    abxis wrote:
    andi kaz wrote:
    hmm emang jaman gini org lebih liat penampilan dulu, tapi tetep harus ada baik didalemnya la.. jadi ya.. penampilan tuh penting :wink:

    kayak ex gw dulu tampang & penampilan cupu abisss, gw paksa gini gitu jadi mendingan :lol: LOL
    wleh2 jgn dibahas2 ampe segitunya kali :lol: :lol:



    Ho...oh

    siapa tuuhhh... buakakaka :lol: :lol:
    huss pamali atuh disebut2 :lol: :lol:
  • Orang cakep pasti sukses, yakin deh..............

    apapun dipermudah.....hehehehe
    :lol: :lol:
  • dimana-mana yang cantik itu yang laku. seperti sayah
  • dimana-mana yang cantik itu yang laku. seperti sayah

    ho...oh :lol:
  • ah tapi kalo mbah pake kepala lebih serem... malah pasiennya makin banyak.,... kalo pake kepala yang cakepan di sangka bukan dukun . gimana nih.. LOL
  • Kalo aku bilang sih tergantung jenis perkerjaannya dan posisinya juga kale,
    kalo kerjanya diperusahaan komersial, trus posisinya marketing manager, mungkin iyalah selain pinter dia juga harus berpenampilan menarik secara dia akan berinteraksi dengan banyak orang dan merepresentasikan perusahaan dia,

    Tapi kalo kerjanya institusi pendidikan, kesehatan, lembaga Internasional, termasuk UN agency (lembaga PBB) de el el, gak mandang cakep, jelek, tinggi, pendek, as long you have capacity and skills, don't pursue jobs coz they will pursue you, trust me :wink:
  • wien wrote:
    Kalo aku bilang sih tergantung jenis perkerjaannya dan posisinya juga kale,
    kalo kerjanya diperusahaan komersial, trus posisinya marketing manager, mungkin iyalah selain pinter dia juga harus berpenampilan menarik secara dia akan berinteraksi dengan banyak orang dan merepresentasikan perusahaan dia,

    Tapi kalo kerjanya institusi pendidikan, kesehatan, lembaga Internasional, termasuk UN agency (lembaga PBB) de el el, gak mandang cakep, jelek, tinggi, pendek, as long you have capacity and skills, don't pursue jobs coz they will pursue you, trust me :wink:
    gue pengennya/idealnya emang begitu, sayangnya hasil penelitian gak gitu, ini beberapa kutipan dari Economist.
    Law
    The difference also applies within professions. Dr Hamermesh looked at the careers of members of a particular (though discreetly anonymous) American law school. He found that those rated attractive on the basis of their graduation photographs went on to earn higher salaries than their less well-favoured colleagues. Moreover, lawyers in private practice tended to be better looking than those working in government departments.

    Economics
    Finally, to add insult to injury, he found that even in his own cerebral and, one might have thought, beauty-blind profession, attractive candidates were more successful in elections for office in the American Economic Association.[/list:u]source: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10311266
  • de Hati wrote:
    wien wrote:
    Kalo aku bilang sih tergantung jenis perkerjaannya dan posisinya juga kale,
    kalo kerjanya diperusahaan komersial, trus posisinya marketing manager, mungkin iyalah selain pinter dia juga harus berpenampilan menarik secara dia akan berinteraksi dengan banyak orang dan merepresentasikan perusahaan dia,

    Tapi kalo kerjanya institusi pendidikan, kesehatan, lembaga Internasional, termasuk UN agency (lembaga PBB) de el el, gak mandang cakep, jelek, tinggi, pendek, as long you have capacity and skills, don't pursue jobs coz they will pursue you, trust me :wink:

    gue pengennya/idealnya emang begitu, sayangnya hasil penelitian gak gitu, ini beberapa kutipan dari Economist.
    Law
    The difference also applies within professions. Dr Hamermesh looked at the careers of members of a particular (though discreetly anonymous) American law school. He found that those rated attractive on the basis of their graduation photographs went on to earn higher salaries than their less well-favoured colleagues. Moreover, lawyers in private practice tended to be better looking than those working in government departments.

    Economics
    Finally, to add insult to injury, he found that even in his own cerebral and, one might have thought, beauty-blind profession, attractive candidates were more successful in elections for office in the American Economic Association.[/list:u]source: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10311266

    Yup, just like i said, kalo bicara kerjaannya dalam ruang lingkup jobs related to economics, commercials, mungkin iya dan ini jelas diskriminatif. Tapi kalau mau memandang lebih luas lagi misalnya berkarir di bidang sosial, dan politik, dll jelas physical appearance bukan segalanya, tapi ukuran good looking and not good looking juga masih debatable kan ya?



  • de Hati wrote:
    wien wrote:
    Kalo aku bilang sih tergantung jenis perkerjaannya dan posisinya juga kale,
    kalo kerjanya diperusahaan komersial, trus posisinya marketing manager, mungkin iyalah selain pinter dia juga harus berpenampilan menarik secara dia akan berinteraksi dengan banyak orang dan merepresentasikan perusahaan dia,

    Tapi kalo kerjanya institusi pendidikan
    , kesehatan, lembaga Internasional, termasuk UN agency (lembaga PBB) de el el, gak mandang cakep, jelek, tinggi, pendek, as long you have capacity and skills, don't pursue jobs coz they will pursue you, trust me :wink:
    gue pengennya/idealnya emang begitu, sayangnya hasil penelitian gak gitu, ini beberapa kutipan dari Economist.
    Law
    The difference also applies within professions. Dr Hamermesh looked at the careers of members of a particular (though discreetly anonymous) American law school. He found that those rated attractive on the basis of their graduation photographs went on to earn higher salaries than their less well-favoured colleagues. Moreover, lawyers in private practice tended to be better looking than those working in government departments.

    Economics
    Finally, to add insult to injury, he found that even in his own cerebral and, one might have thought, beauty-blind profession, attractive candidates were more successful in elections for office in the American Economic Association.[/list:u]source: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10311266

    economics di sini bukan di finance ya, american economics associatian itu termasuk bagian dari institusi pendidikan, asosiasi profesor-profesor amerika, setara dengan ISEI di Indonesia.

    Politics?
      That last distinction also applies to elections to public office, as was neatly demonstrated by Niclas Berggren, of the Ratio Institute in Stockholm, and his colleagues. Dr Berggren's team looked at almost 2,000 candidates in Finnish elections. They asked foreigners (mainly Americans and Swedes) to examine the candidates' campaign photographs and rank them for beauty. They then compared those rankings with the actual election results. They were able to eliminate the effects of party preference because Finland has a system of proportional representation that pits candidates of the same party against one another. Lo and behold, the more beautiful candidates, as ranked by people who knew nothing of Finland's internal politics, tended to have been the more successful—though in this case, unlike Dr Hamermesh's economic results, the effect was larger for women than for men.[/list:u]
  • de Hati wrote:
    de Hati wrote:
    wien wrote:
    Kalo aku bilang sih tergantung jenis perkerjaannya dan posisinya juga kale,
    kalo kerjanya diperusahaan komersial, trus posisinya marketing manager, mungkin iyalah selain pinter dia juga harus berpenampilan menarik secara dia akan berinteraksi dengan banyak orang dan merepresentasikan perusahaan dia,

    Tapi kalo kerjanya institusi pendidikan
    , kesehatan, lembaga Internasional, termasuk UN agency (lembaga PBB) de el el, gak mandang cakep, jelek, tinggi, pendek, as long you have capacity and skills, don't pursue jobs coz they will pursue you, trust me :wink:
    gue pengennya/idealnya emang begitu, sayangnya hasil penelitian gak gitu, ini beberapa kutipan dari Economist.
    Law
    The difference also applies within professions. Dr Hamermesh looked at the careers of members of a particular (though discreetly anonymous) American law school. He found that those rated attractive on the basis of their graduation photographs went on to earn higher salaries than their less well-favoured colleagues. Moreover, lawyers in private practice tended to be better looking than those working in government departments.

    Economics
    Finally, to add insult to injury, he found that even in his own cerebral and, one might have thought, beauty-blind profession, attractive candidates were more successful in elections for office in the American Economic Association.[/list:u]source: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10311266

    economics di sini bukan di finance ya, american economics associatian itu termasuk bagian dari institusi pendidikan, asosiasi profesor-profesor amerika, setara dengan ISEI di Indonesia.

    Politics?
      That last distinction also applies to elections to public office, as was neatly demonstrated by Niclas Berggren, of the Ratio Institute in Stockholm, and his colleagues. Dr Berggren's team looked at almost 2,000 candidates in Finnish elections. They asked foreigners (mainly Americans and Swedes) to examine the candidates' campaign photographs and rank them for beauty. They then compared those rankings with the actual election results. They were able to eliminate the effects of party preference because Finland has a system of proportional representation that pits candidates of the same party against one another. Lo and behold, the more beautiful candidates, as ranked by people who knew nothing of Finland's internal politics, tended to have been the more successful—though in this case, unlike Dr Hamermesh's economic results, the effect was larger for women than for men.[/list:u]

    Oh well, berarti sangat iritating dan discriminative ya :(
    tapi mudah-mudahan kita sepakat bahwa tidak semua institusi memberlakukan hal yang seperti itu, kalo boleh kasih contoh personal experiences, kalau tempat kerjaku sekarang (sebuah lembaga PBB) menseleksi berdasarkan cakep or tidak cakep secara fisik aku dan beberapa teman-teman sudah lama tersingkirkan darisini (wah minder)
    tapi untungnya tidak, karena kualifikasi dan kapasitas serta performa kerja tetap manjadi standar penilaian kami tetap bisa "dipakai" dan beberapa malah menunjukkan peningkatan karir yang luar biasa, contoh lain, secara fisik mingkin prof. Abudullah An-naim mungkin biasa saja, tetapi beliau bisa menjadi Guru Besar di Emory law school, karena isi kepalanya (pengetahuannya) bukan karena tampangnya :)
    intinya, I just want to encourages teman-teman BFers untuk selalu mengasah wawasan, yakinlah ini modal utama, kalau tahun2 mendatang dunia kerja di Indonesia juga memberlakukan standar cakep dan tidak cakep kita bisa counter karena kita punya skill dan qualified.

    P.S: salam kenal buat de Hati


  • wien wrote:
    de Hati wrote:
    de Hati wrote:
    wien wrote:
    Kalo aku bilang sih tergantung jenis perkerjaannya dan posisinya juga kale,
    kalo kerjanya diperusahaan komersial, trus posisinya marketing manager, mungkin iyalah selain pinter dia juga harus berpenampilan menarik secara dia akan berinteraksi dengan banyak orang dan merepresentasikan perusahaan dia,

    Tapi kalo kerjanya institusi pendidikan
    , kesehatan, lembaga Internasional, termasuk UN agency (lembaga PBB) de el el, gak mandang cakep, jelek, tinggi, pendek, as long you have capacity and skills, don't pursue jobs coz they will pursue you, trust me :wink:
    gue pengennya/idealnya emang begitu, sayangnya hasil penelitian gak gitu, ini beberapa kutipan dari Economist.
    Law
    The difference also applies within professions. Dr Hamermesh looked at the careers of members of a particular (though discreetly anonymous) American law school. He found that those rated attractive on the basis of their graduation photographs went on to earn higher salaries than their less well-favoured colleagues. Moreover, lawyers in private practice tended to be better looking than those working in government departments.

    Economics
    Finally, to add insult to injury, he found that even in his own cerebral and, one might have thought, beauty-blind profession, attractive candidates were more successful in elections for office in the American Economic Association.[/list:u]source: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10311266

    economics di sini bukan di finance ya, american economics associatian itu termasuk bagian dari institusi pendidikan, asosiasi profesor-profesor amerika, setara dengan ISEI di Indonesia.

    Politics?
      That last distinction also applies to elections to public office, as was neatly demonstrated by Niclas Berggren, of the Ratio Institute in Stockholm, and his colleagues. Dr Berggren's team looked at almost 2,000 candidates in Finnish elections. They asked foreigners (mainly Americans and Swedes) to examine the candidates' campaign photographs and rank them for beauty. They then compared those rankings with the actual election results. They were able to eliminate the effects of party preference because Finland has a system of proportional representation that pits candidates of the same party against one another. Lo and behold, the more beautiful candidates, as ranked by people who knew nothing of Finland's internal politics, tended to have been the more successful—though in this case, unlike Dr Hamermesh's economic results, the effect was larger for women than for men.[/list:u]

    Oh well, berarti sangat iritating dan discriminative ya :(
    tapi mudah-mudahan kita sepakat bahwa tidak semua institusi memberlakukan hal yang seperti itu, kalo boleh kasih contoh personal experiences, kalau tempat kerjaku sekarang (sebuah lembaga PBB) menseleksi berdasarkan cakep or tidak cakep secara fisik aku dan beberapa teman-teman sudah lama tersingkirkan darisini (wah minder)
    tapi untungnya tidak, karena kualifikasi dan kapasitas serta performa kerja tetap manjadi standar penilaian kami tetap bisa "dipakai" dan beberapa malah menunjukkan peningkatan karir yang luar biasa, contoh lain, secara fisik mingkin prof. Abudullah An-naim mungkin biasa saja, tetapi beliau bisa menjadi Guru Besar di Emory law school, karena isi kepalanya (pengetahuannya) bukan karena tampangnya :)
    intinya, I just want to encourages teman-teman BFers untuk selalu mengasah wawasan, yakinlah ini modal utama, kalau tahun2 mendatang dunia kerja di Indonesia juga memberlakukan standar cakep dan tidak cakep kita bisa counter karena kita punya skill dan qualified.

    P.S: salam kenal buat de Hati




    Uda gw bilang, outer beauty itu yg lbh dinilai org lbh dulu, dan itu berlaku secara MAYORITAS / KEBANYAKAN ATAU KIRA2 95%, SISANYA YG 5% MUNGKIN GAK TERLALU MEMENTINGKAN ITU

    Tapi gw yakin , KLO MAU JUJUR...yg 5% pun klo dikasih pilihan mereka akan pilih yg penampilannya lbh oke dari yg sebelumnya.

    ini kenyataan dan FAKTA men.....


    hehehhe
Sign In or Register to comment.